(PM if you want a contact.)Many companies have an incentive to obscure the legality of this because their whole business model is based on people who operate an STR in their non-primary residence.I wish you luck!

It's not uncommon to receive emails pitching the same deal to me while obscuring whats really going on.  

Would you trust a used car salesman's recommended mechanical inspector, however many independent certifications from obscure, official-sounding organizations he had?

Copy/pasting my response from another thread on the exact same topic, which was made in a more obscure subforum.I support this.

The last thing I want to do is end up having to foreclose on the property, and end up having to pay someone a bunch of money to get my own property back because of some obscure lending contract...

I don't know anything about Florida though, hopefully there isn't some obscure law that allows her to stay.

But if this is the case, then is it fair to say that neither the inspector nor the buyer's agent could be held liable for a defect which is obscured by the seller's possessions? 

The one thing I can’t seem to gather from all of your writings is the level of transparency that you encourage your clients to have with their lenders.Are your clients purposely trying to obscure this maneuver from their lenders by first placing the property into a land trust before assigning the LLC as the beneficiary of the Land Trust?

Unfortunately, it could have a fairly obscure name.

I'm sure you can find some obscure reference of that but realistically this is one order of magnitude over the dot com.