The engineer will usually go into a few of each type of 1,2,3,4 bedrooms, and apply the findings to the rest (again, unless there is uniqueness to each unit) So between a 14-unit and a 95-unit and 300-unit there should not be such a huge discrepancy in pricing...just saying.

Great post but there are a few discrepancies with the post.#1.

If you have an older house that was added to decades ago, and the county records do not reflect those changes (they did not obtain permits back in the days when this was not well policed,) the AVM will kick in and a huge discrepancy will occur in perceived value.

Also, if the homeowner does not want to buy the home for 108K, will they have a discrepancy judgement for the difference?

It is military related though, so I guess that explains the discrepancy.

If I find any discrepencies, I either throw out the application or confront the potential tenant for an explanation.

I would just make sure that I agree with all of the numbers presented by the seller and address any discrepancies.

Underwriters look for rapid acquisition of properties from a nationwide title search, they double check address and if there are any discrepancies the borrower needs to write a letter of explanation on title and the credit report as well as other methods.

I believe there is a discrepancy in my appraisal value compared to the open market’s value for multi-unit buildings.

The discrepancy here is the assessment has my $250K property valued with $100K land value..