NOW, if we are to have the HOA responsible for the interior of each of the units as well, here are the eminent problems I foresee:    - owners will be even more careless and act irresponsibly for their units since they don't pay for the repairs of the interior of their units    - because many of the owners rent their units (technically they sublease), they will be even less incentivized to maintain their units    - the HOA pays for all maintenance and repairs of units and owners get the benefit of rent    - repairs/maintenance of units is not properly proportioned to their respective owners, meaning that there is no incentive to keep my property up because any repairs will come out of the pocket of all other owners    - this penalizes good owners and rewards slummy owners    - this will put the owner residents at a big disadvantage because the owners who rent their units will cause maintenance fees to increase for all owners, especially due to high turnover    --> in Summary, this is a straight example of socialist-style system (I know, my family immigrated to the US from the USSR) and it will just sink our whole Co-op.  

You talking just concrete placement or are you talking excavation, compaction, set up and pour in place...?  

The USCIS will use an ‘Inverted Sliding Scale’ to determine whether the investment is substantial in proportion to the overall cost of the enterprise.Upon conclusion of the business, investors must return to their countries of origin, or change their status.

The rents are not increasing proportionally with appreciation, like they are in strong coastal markets.

Is the rent likely to be proportional to the sale price compared to higher levels?  

It caused some serious foreign and domestic money to come pouring in to the Grand Rapids area and we are currently in a housing (and rental) shortage of historical proportions.  

Proportions and style doesn't tie in to what's existing or enhance it.

Rolling closing costs into the interest rate is essentially inverted discount points, and discount points are proportional to loan amount, whereas closing costs are mostly fixed.0.5% of loan amount is a lot more on a $700k deal than on a $123k deal, and those are both going to have ballpark the same closing costs.

#1 - $200k property x 25% down payment = $50k down payment#2 - Deal sponsors who raise private capital for most or all of the down payment can provide 70% (rather than proportional) of the equity to the private investors.  

If yes, that's an option.Consider bringing a partner in this deal and split everything in proportion of how much money each of you contributes (e.g. 50/50).