It was an evolutionary process for me and is can still change a little as I change or the markets alter.

It blows my mind Mike that the same people who so heavily want to believe in the evolutionary theory want to stop evolution from occurring.

@Daniel MendezYou are the product of hundreds of thousands of years of competition through the evolutionary process.

If anything it will be evolutionary not revolutionary only in countries where people can afford.

It’s an evolutionary process.

He maybe that is the next Bigger Pockets evolutionary step.

Call it Darwin’s revenge: Ignorance as an evolutionary adaptive failure.I have but two goals: The ability to bet on global weather volatility, and a way to express the trade I like to call “short unscience.”

He used the word flexibility, but that's very different from the Darwinistic view of adaptation (Darwin's term "adaptation" is purely physical and evolutionary; Eddie used flexibility in a social context).

Lots of speculation and different opinions about why--evolutionary preference for safety vs. plenty,  social pressure and peer cues, but the experiments repeat the same results all the time.So, lots of people (well, at least some) can likely see opportunity but when the weigh risks of going ahead vs. not they unconsciously overemphasize the risk of loss.

this is not the market for you ... the majority of successful or knowledgeable people in this market "graduated" into it almost in an "evolutionary" way they just got here ... its just too high stakes for many involved and it takes years of experience to one day decide to learn it.