The investor's theory behind his suggestion was to use the 500k loan to wipe all debt and only pay on the new loan, I'm not sure if this would be advantageous financially due to my current debts monthly payments set at: LTR = 1900MTR = 1500HELOC= 550Vehicle = 850Total = 4800 monthly At current loan rates for 500k, and a 800+ credit score be a lower monthly than the $4800? 

I’ve had very good luck keeping my rates lower through a small company than quotes I received from the big name insurance companies.

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

Those rent increases have pushed some lower-income tenants to the brink of what they can afford.

Believe it or not, I’ve seen many investor ads targeting these keywords, which have NOTHING TO DO WITH SELLERS.Targeting the wrong audience can hurt you in several ways:You’ll get impressions that won’t result in clicks, which will lower your CTR (Click-Through Rate)—a key metric for Google.You might actually get a click from a curious person who just wants to check it out.

The problem is that people will never know that they sold their home for $30k to $50k lower than what they could have gotten. 

My buybox is <150k, as turnkey as possible, 3 bed, prefer 2 bath but will do 1 bath for the right deal, neighborhoods with lower crimes than the nearby areas, rent at <1.5k.

I would think this is especially true in lower price point areas. 

It’s a familiar debate, as Californians have faced this choice twice since 2018.Under the 2019 Tenant Protection Act, rent hikes have been capped at 10% per year or lower if inflation rates dictate.

Is this too much and if so when should I lower the price and how much is reasonable enough for both sides