Reminds me of Remington financial.Although they must make enough loans to not get shut down.One lady in FLA who had a thread on them.. said they changed their draw procedure mid stream.. were they wanted borrower to front the draw money and they would reimburse.. well your already going for the no money down borrower.. this left the lady in a pinch since she did not have the funds to front the rehab... that's a synopsis of what others have said in the thread.. but from what I gleaned at least 2 people actually got funded.

Since there is no one that would contest the foreclosure it should be a procedural process not involving litigation.Have any of you experienced this situation in the past?

3) Make changes to prevent the root cause of the problem (better instructions, guidelines that are more precise, more training, change the procedure completely). 4) Measure to see if there is improvement with regard to the original "problem".

How the customer's property is treated as well as the processes and procedures that need to take place when entering a customer's property.  

Land use and building permit procedures are what trigger reassessments here, so you don't have to worry about that. 

Who knows....they may have a legitimate reason that they weren't paying rent and want to pay going forward (if this is the case, I would still go through standard procedures of qualifying/screening them).

They will know the procedure required based on what the material is. 

Even if there is an active listing, the Seller may have instructed the agent to take it off the market, place on hold, not bother with pricing lower than X, etc. (4) Contact Your Board (usually only for residential) - now this maybe seen as a no no, but if the MLS shows the property as active, many local realtor boards have established procedures for inputting listings.

They are an elderly couple I told them I would ask around to see if I can figure out if this is standard procedure.

Today’s decision will not dampen our efforts or affect our focus on the mission of the agency.”PHH had originally been fined only $6.4 million in November 2014 for kickbacks in the form of reinsurance premiums paid to a PHH subsidiary by mortgage insurers, a violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).