@James Canoy So I just finished reading Shoe Dog, by Phil Knight the founder of Nike, yesterday and heard a point that came to mind when reading your post.

@Alamen Ems had by Bachelor Party in a Luxury Box in the Shoe.  

We are all running a race here, and you are doing well with your shoe laces tied together!

You don't want muddy shoes on your fresh carpet.

Hi Christopher I not familiar with WA law but you can read my blog "how to beat the due on sale clause" which is for primarily California...At any rate here's a quick how I do it...If the deed is not recorded i.e. it's held in escrow and certain safeguards are in place to protect the buyer and seller...Then you just do a vendor vendee transfer in other words your new buyer will step into your shoes of course he pays you for the privilege...If the deed is recorded in your entities name preferably and LLC which by the way eliminates DF issues.. then you do a straight sale to the new buyer either he assumes your position with you holding a note etc... or goes to the bank for refining the loan..and pays everyone off..Anytime you hold a note your at risk make sure all payment are made to the collectio company then you'll know if your buyer is lateI have been doing Subject to's for over twenty years and have never had a bank even look my way..Always use a third party collection company to service all the debt on the property this is common and arouses no suspicion on the banks side...Any help write direct [email protected]

It does sound like you bought assignment rights and are stepping into the shoes of the winning buyer at sale.

A portion of that has you Put YOURSELF in your Opponent/Partners Shoes and be able to Think like Them.However we're very complicated beings and even if you know someone closely for many years, you still can be surprised.1.

The judge I went before was ready to shoe me away, seemed to be a bleeding heart, but I had all my proof so he had to go ahead with my trial & judgment. 

What angle would you start from if you were in my shoes?

(how did they look), they were both wearing CHEAP "dress for less" suits, the main "presenter" had worn out PAYLESS "real-immitation-fake-leather" shoes.