And California also capped security deposit, thus literally robbing landlords by AB 468 that's faking human right issue.If there is class lawsuit, I want to be the first to jump on.But my question is, why landlords are so docile to this evil law? 

Lease should make tenant secure renter insurance.

If you are purchasing an asset then you could cross collaterize both but if $ for non secured asset may be easier to look to sell the loan.

If it’s a chattel filing with the state, the foreclosure would not affect the secured party’s interest… they could still repossess the equipment.

This may be the best time to secure a property, live in it (and less than 20% as a primary), then move or reassess the plan in a year after your mortgage implication is up.

Focusing on securing funding, partnering with quality contractors, and sourcing off-market properties certainly seems to be a winning formula.By prioritizing the purchase price and understanding the needs of both your lenders and contractors, you’ve managed to create a sustainable and successful investment strategy.

Consider all the things that could go wrong and see if the lease addresses them: unauthorized pets or tenants, early termination, security deposit, lease violations, late rent, eviction, lawn maintenance, parking, etc.5.

With regard to securing a tenant, I think you are attracting the applicants you want, but maybe are gun shy about accepting them. 1.

Here are some pros and cons:Pros:Safety and Security: Requiring background checks for all adult occupants helps ensure that everyone living on your property has been screened for potential risks, such as criminal history.

Is it possible just to secure the additional money needed in repairs?