WE DO NOT NEED YOUR CONDESCENDING REMARKS!

It wasn't about you Zachary......Michael made a good point as well, as I was typing my rant.Zachary, glad to hear you had a business law course, my earlier remark may not apply as to studying the laws of agency, but you did say you had not agency relationship earlier, so I assumed you missed that class on implied agency relationships.

Remarkably, the fire burned for over 20 minutes in the dryer without causing fire damage to any of contents of the laundry room or the rest of the house (and only minimal smoke damage).

The following code supports Susan's and my remarks:§ 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(i) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, a taxpayer electing to apply the de minimis safe harbor under this paragraph (f) may not capitalize under § 1.263(a)-2(d)(1) or § 1.263(a)-3(d) any amount paid in the taxable year for the acquisition or production of a unit of tangible property nor treat as a material or supply under § 1.162-3(a) any amount paid in the taxable year for tangible property if the amount specified under this paragraph (f)(1) meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this section.

I would echo Chad's remark in that you need to make sure development charges are taken into account in your soft costs.

Moreover, contrary to your sarcastic remark, I haven't had a day job in over 15 years.

I'm working almost full time where I'm at now- $24 an hour, my credit score is 724 ish and I have no bad remarks on my history.I have already missed out on two properties I loved because of this nonsense with my school and now there's a third one that's even better than the first two.

Hi Alicia,I am a wholesaler in Utah and would agree with Skyler in his remarks. 

@Jay Hinrichs I always love reading your posts and agree with your remarks.

She has been very unkind to me when upset about something not getting fixed on her timeline.