
15 November 2006 | 0 replies
Property #2 has the same circumstance.

4 December 2006 | 0 replies
I have no idea how long it will take to get them back on.Third - they disputed a debt as "not mine" when I distinctly said IT WAS MINE and wanted to pay because the company was great to me.

13 December 2007 | 48 replies
Of course circumstances (retirement, medical expenses, divorce, etc.) may cause you to sell sooner than you want but let's face it, how much can you *really* lose on an investment property of let's say $150k.

18 August 2007 | 41 replies
He told me to be on the safe side and truly avoid red flags I should wait closer to 2 years.1031 exchanges are based on INVESTMENT property that is bought with the intent of an renting or for business or commercial use, in other words not flipping (dealing), so in an audit situation you must be able to show that you intended to purhcase the property for investment purposes but for some unforseen circumstance (job moved, bad spot financially you had to sell).

31 January 2007 | 2 replies
Yes, you can exclude a partial amount or percentage of the exclusion IF you qualify for one of the exemptions, which are usually something that is called an unforseen circumstance.

16 January 2007 | 9 replies
I distinctly remember a pipe dream of buying a house at one point and then renting it out after I left.There are a ton of older houses just south and east of campus that are prime for student rentals.Onto my goals, I just want to close my first deal in 2007.

9 January 2007 | 1 reply
Three years ago we really wanted to buy this property when it was being sold under normal circumstances and someone bought it out from under us.

5 August 2010 | 8 replies
If the owner doesn't make the request they are creating a possible problem for themselves on the Civil level and are breaking a legal contract, which under certain circumstances is a fraudulent act.

7 February 2007 | 9 replies
.) -- including a lien on the stock of a cooperative housing corporation (a “co-op”) -- no lender can enforce its due-on-sale clause due to any of the following prevalent circumstances:(1) The creation of a lien (or other encumbrance subordinate to the lender's security instrument) that does not relate to a transfer of rights of occupancy in the property;(2) The creation of a purchase money security interest for household appliances;(3) A transfer by devise, descent, or operation of law on the death of a joint tenant or tenant by the entirety;(4) The granting of a leasehold interest of three years or less* not containing an option to purchase(5) A transfer to a relative resulting from the death of a borrower;(6) A transfer where the spouse or children of the borrower would become owners of the property;(7) A transfer resulting from a decree of dissolution of marriage, legal separation agreement, or from an incidental property settlement agreement, by which the spouse of the borrower becomes an owner of the property(8) A transfer of the borrower’s property into an inter vivos trust in which the borrower is and remains a beneficiary and which [trust agreement] does not relate to a transfer of rights of occupancy in the property; or(9) Any other transfer or disposition described in regulations prescribed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board.

11 February 2007 | 2 replies
Seems that everyone wants all of the above & it can be done under the right circumstances, but it’s not the norm.Happy Hunting & All the best,Roz