@Brendan Lyons I think one hand can wash the other, of course, you will pay taxes on any gains in your LLC, but in the end its all your pot of money, right? 

At the end of the day, all of our money goes in the same pot and I don't see anything wrong with this two-pronged approach. 

I’ve heard of giving welcome gift baskets with things like light bulbs, pot holders, etc.

(These tenants are spoiled children ... the only deal you should make with them is a deal to go away)  They can either leave voluntarily for a modest monetary incentive (which should be less than the total cost to evict) or go through an eviction.In the end, a contract doesn't mean anything unless you bring in lawyers to enforce it. 

Fast forward a few months into the tenancy, and the guy starts smoking pot inside and out, which is specifically outlined by an addition in the lease that states no smoking of any kind on the property (In Canada, smoking pot became legal in Oct 2018 but BC agreed that if the original lease has a non-smoking policy (which it does), it still applied to marijuana).

You are essentially placing the liability of the consulting into a single "pot" with your property - an issue with either business that isn't covered by insurance puts them both at risk.

There are no eviction-worthy offenses (as far as I know - more on this later) and she has told me that she will never voluntarily move out under any circumstances.4) The tenant is allegedly handicapped although I am doubtful whether she has any documentation to that affect. 5) Besides the aforementioned concerns, I am also concerned about legal liability over the same concerns.

That usually gets me 400-500/month per door.I don't hold back extra for capital expenditures because I start with a nice pot of money.

After reading a number of articles and forum pots, it is quite evident that the new FEMA flood zone insurance requirements are adversely affecting a lot of home owners.

Is there a reason they need to sweeten the pot.