FLW is the headquarters for the Army's Chemical Program, Engineers, and Military Police, they have basic training and OSUT there, officer training, and warrant officer training.

A few times we realized that the property wasn't up to par to warrant "market" rates, current tenants were too stable (30+ years) and we didn't want to risk the downtime + renovations, or sometimes just made minor increases for incumbent tenants. 

@Jimmy ToussaintGenerally-speaking:If a tenant owns the home, that income stream is considered more stable.In theory, tenant that owns their home will:Take better care of their home (pride of ownership)Be less likely to move (difficult to move a MH)Will have a lower 'burden' to pay (assuming the house is paid off)Therefore the income from the TOHs will warrant a lower cap rate.What about the POHs?

Said lien was last modified onFebruary 27, 2019, with a new judgment total in the amount of $2,668.96.REQUIREMENT: Verify and determine with said creditor that all modifications and/ordelinquencies have been paid in full prior to closing the contemplated transaction.A Warrant for Delinquent Taxes in the amount of $20,047.92 and docketed July 16,2012 under Case No. 126921902 the 3rd Judicial District Court, in and for the Countyof Salt Lake, State of Utah, showing Geoff Watson as DEBTOR and THE STATETAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH as CREDITOR.Paperless Child Support Lien (ongoing) for child support filed originally on August 21,2013 under Case No. 136933450 in the 3rd District Court, State of Utah, County ofSalt Lake, showing Geoffrey W.

Even if it’s a small issue that does not warrant reduction negotiations it’s still the sellers burden to fix whatever issues.

This would probably warrant an HVAC guy looking things over.

This would be for warrantable buildings only.

Higher fees will have the net effect of lowering returns, but an experienced syndicator is taking some level of risk off the table, so the lower return is warranted. 

Is the roof system he’s adding Warrantable as a 2nd Roof?

Your best argument seems to be that the breach was not material and that, accordingly, it warrants at best a suspension of performance by buyer until the matter is rectified but not a termination of the contract.