Essentially, your rents are held artificially low, so that the management company can tack on their own fees and the total comes out to something that sounds reasonable.   

I think the prices are artificially constrained because of the inability to develop new housing stock to meet the demand for housing. 

At the moment, interest rates are artificially being kept low.Should new investors worry?

A combination of foreign cash investors and the growth of things like biggerpockets have increased the demand artificially.

The fed is artificially propping up the economy with QE4, developers are overbuilding, and the market seems like its shooting up way faster than it deserves to and I feel a correction is imminent.

I have seen the stats that in San Diego the new listings are down ~30% for April and where down over 30% for March versus a year ago.That the effect of $0 STR rents have not resulted in many LL already placing the RE on the market.That any result of lost LTR rents (which we have had 0 lost LTR rents so far) or difficulty finding new tenants for LTR units has not yet resulted in units hitting the market.Logic seems to be that if it were not for artificially holding units off the market, that we should see more RE on the market in 2020 that 2019 because of the various lost incomes (not just lost rent, but people making less money due to layoffs, reduced hours, etc.). 

The BlackRocks of the world artificially inflated the market. 

If you do not do this, the years after rehab will reflect an artificially high return and 8 to 10 years later you will project an artificially low return. 

That's quite a large decrease especially considering that $1 in 1982 would have the purchasing power of about $3 in today's market.One explanation could be that Interest rates were artificially low for a long time (until recently) which may have diminished the need for seller financing. 

A Catch-22 rental is an under-maintained property being rented to the poor for artificially low rent rates where our poor residents can live without subsidy, but at the cost of their health.