Are there structural problems, are they going to widen Richmond road to 3 feet from the front door, is it sitting on toxic waste land.

Are there any toxic residues from past usage?

So I had time to think, and decided one of the things in the my acceptance/counter was that they would have clean up the residues, fumes, chemicals, and odors of the fragrance and toxic chemicals in the house, and come down to 170 or a bit less, maybe pay closing costs, all or half.

Unfortunately, it's a rehash and I think it's irritating as heck to have agents hawking shop worn properties and "new listings" .

Check with your local state laws on this, as I'm not an attorney, but that's my understanding of Indiana's state laws.I'll repeat that I did not want to get my license at first and was irritated about having to do so.

A pile of asbestos siding or a bunch of lead painted wood and you have a big and expensive cleanup effort.Build six apartments on that lot and five years from now the resident's kids dig up something toxic and you end up losing everything you've built up.

I would have to agree with everyone else in saying, the particular commute you described would become a bit irritating after a while.

It's irritating because I wanted to assume that property as buy-and-hold.

If I was the tenant I might be a little irritated that I now have to figure out how to get the rent to you when you used to pick it up.

Another thing to consider for best is that technology allows one to track whether or not their investor base is accredited over time quite easily where a stale subscription agreement would only provide this verification at a single point in time without irritating their investors.