I'm not stating that it's inherently wrong, but aspects of it have gotten out of control.

Hey @Joseph Chacko vellukunnel,I think @William Kwong covered some great points especially with the financing aspect.

My experience indicates that solid due diligence upfront on the economics is the critical factor, the tax aspects often take care of themselves with only modest planning.

So Doorvest is getting everything that produces a high return and you get the aspects of real estate investing that have low a return. 

Think through each aspect of a potential transaction, and how you will respond to the inevitable hiccups, problems, frustrations, and disappointments that occur in every start up business. 5.

Readers should seek professional advice.Hello Ashish,Would love to connect and discuss a little more about the potential tax aspects of all this.

Your idea on the social work aspect is right on.

You probably won't get distributions during hold.Syndications are generally tax-efficient, and Michael highlighted several key aspects.

Yes, someone ONLY focused on MORE cash-flow can have tunnel vision and ignore other pertinent aspects of investing, BUT the 1% rule has noting to do with ONLY focusing on cash-flow.

Point is, (a) it's all but impossible for the investment to go to $0 and (b) you have direct, impactful CONTROL of outcome. 2nd: Back to the CONTROL aspect.