"We buy houses" should not be a protected trademark.I asked a patent attorney friend about something similar a few years ago. 

Corporations will likely begin developing their own schools to serve their own needs (this happened with a Bank in Brazil that couldn't location enough qualified prospects).(2)  Patent System overhaul....Due to speed of innovation, our patent system now discourages, not encourages innovation.(3) Remove all money from politics (unfortunately, I don't think this will happen).(4) All countries must develop a global governmental body and give it sufficient power to effectively police and punish corporations that commit crimes globally, particularly in countries with little power. 

with a patent atty brother, i have access to a tax atty in his firm and he said the same thing.  

Oh, i forgot to mention, i live with my patents in their house and actually renting the property bought w 1031

Only cost him a million to win that lawsuit after they offered to license the patent to him for free.

That is patently false.

I've been interested in real estate most of my life, but have pursued just about everything else first, including getting a college education, owning businesses, and getting patents for my invention. 

If its simply a plain jane real estate brokerage I don't see anything patently wrong with the name.

This happens pretty much every week in the circles I travel in so to claim that the purchase price is the fair market or intrinsic value from an economic standpoint is patently inaccurate.

At the end of the day, FICO does work well and they modify and patent their math equation, which is secret and proprietary very often.