If someone gets injured on your job site, you don't want that coming back to you. 

That lawsuit is a claim for fraud, and that’s what fraud typically is...a misunderstanding and someone being “injured” and wanting to hold the other responsible for it.

You certainly want him to have this just in case somebody gets injured on the job, you do not want to be held liable to pay this guy salary for a long period of time if the injury is serious.

But the other way around, you injure someone let's say and get sued personally, those LLC's are owned by you personally so lawyers can get to them if you don't have a holding LLC with charging order protection like in WY and a couple other places.Finally, please go the partnership route, single member LLC'S are just sole proprietorship and there really is no protection between you and the entity you are one and the same.

Much easier if the tenant has renters insurance and liability insurance, for the injured party to get a quick settlement from the tenant's insurance company.

If this insurance is not current, you could have liability issues if someone were to be injured on your work site.

Examples of permissible activities include the preparation professional scholarly articles for publication and participation in seminars, lectures, and civic programs.A Member who writes or speaks for the purpose of educating members of the public shall never imply that he or she is speaking on behalf of any other entity, including RMAI, unless specifically authorized to do so.A Member should report unethical behavior of others to the appropriate governing body.CANON 6 – RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMAn RMAI Member shall always demonstrate respect for the judicial system which shall be revealed through the absence of litigation (or threat of litigation) that is intended to harass or maliciously injure another or knowingly violates local, state, or federal laws or court rules adopted for the bringing of an action before the judiciary.Commentary:A Member may, where permissible under the bounds of the law, exercise its reasonable judgment in pursuing with ardor legally owed obligations.A Member may test the bounds of law when faced with issues that are new, uncertain, or have contradictory treatment by the courts, regulators, or in statute but shall not assert a position that is frivolous or for the purpose of harassing another.A Member may, in good faith and within the bounds of the law, take steps to test the correctness of a ruling of a tribunal or the validity of a statute or regulation, provided they proceed with caution, demonstrate respect for the judicial, executive, or legislative entity being challenged, and strive to comply with the existing ruling, regulation, or statute until such time that it is overturned or otherwise changed.A Member should treat proceedings that may occur in quasi-judicial or administrative systems with the same respect as they would with proceedings before the judicial system.A Member shall not give or lend anything of value to a judge, official, or employee of a tribunal before which it has business.CANON 7 – RESPECT FOR THE ASSOCIATIONAn RMAI Member shall always demonstrate respect for RMAI which shall be revealed through their cooperation in adhering to the RMAI Bylaws, RMAI Code of Ethics, and as applicable the RMAI Certification Program and through prompt responses to correspondence from RMAI staff, RMAI agents, the RMAI Ethics Committee, RMAI Certification Audit Committee, or RMAI Certification Remediation Committee concerning alleged, perceived, or actual violations of the Bylaws, Code of Ethics, or Certification Program.Commentary:Membership in RMAI is a privilege and not a right.

The next guests will almost certainly be upset that the hot tub is out of service for their stay and are likely to injure my near perfect streak of 5 star ratings which will injure search rankings and possible lose me bookings.

Or, think about if someone gets injured on the property and ends up with a life-long disability.

This was the strategy I used when I successfully sued the my state government on behalf of my disabled son.Your ex-tenant needs to prove that she was injured, and that your actions were a "proximate cause" of her injuries, and that the amount she is suing for is reasonable in light of her presumed injuries.