I thought it was a straight forward question, with a no there isn't a way or yes you have options to not have to pay insurance until loan is paid off.

Both those make it a “no thanks” in my book.  

I tell them I want to put in an offer for $x no contingencies, no inspections  close ASAP found a good one Friday   I have it under contract   Found another this AM have it under contract Gurus try to make things so much harder so you buy their books and courses  Here is what a 30 second search showed me in Houston 2 BR 2 BA 90k lessit’s up to you to researching these are a go or a no 

My wife and I have found a pretty awesome SFR with an ADU and potential to split the two levels into separate units and it's on the lake with no HOA.We definitely want to get this thing under contract, do about $35k in rehab over 3 months then get a cash out refi when it's renting out...we've looked into some of the basic options lease-to-own, subject to, owner financing...etc let's say all those are a no go...Without throwing the $150k as a 20% down payment on the $700k purchase price how can I structure this to be a viable solution?

But then again a partial BRRRR is still better than a no BRRRR, but you also have downsides, from lower cash flow to an increased holding period where you will be fronting the holding costs and the renovation costs. 

There has to be some solid plan for getting a value-add from the investment for a no-money-down scenario to make sense. 

Dont listen to peter, do it.3500 on a 200k is a no brainer.

@Jorge RosalesI agree with Luke, negative cash flow is a no go for me.

For me its a NO and a red flag even with the flipped units, the amount of due diligence on an older property like that is not worth it- considering in the same market you could purchase 2-3 cash flowing SFH (as a few responded) 

Was perfect for this type of investor, but many reported to me that it was a no go due to City not allowing it.