We are out of state investors and are solely relying on our REA and the home inspector.

Personally I believe I will benefit from appreciation when I sell but there was never any intent on my part to rely on it as a expected positive outcome.

Like many of you, I’ve put in the hours and years at my day job, saved, done the right things, and realized that I need to be doing more than relying on stocks and 401(k)s (I’m not a fan of mutual funds).

The Agency’s investigations are complaint driven, so we rely heavily on the public, and our licensees to bring these individuals to our attention.

Never rely on one lender to finance a deal because it could fall through.

A lot of my clients here in the Chicago suburbs use this strategy to pick up there first few properties before they start having to rely on savings for the full 20-25% down payment. 

Well, you of course can’t rely on “hints” about whether the loan is a first or a second, but.....it hints at a $90k debt, which would hint at a first.

Do not rely on it for legal advice.

If the buyer defaults, my credit gets wrecked not theirs were it gets dicy is on sub too were the seller has actually transferred ownership to another party and is relying on that party to make payments.. that's the risk 

I'm looking for a company that I can rely on staffing so I don't have to keep on hiring and retraining VAs.