Perhaps they like to see a written 7-day notice (and perhaps with some type of evidence of “service” on the tenant) not work before you take the matter to court; tho, the following document also does not seem to care about the time or the manner of the initial demand (Notice): https://s3.amazonaws.com/cobbcounty.org.if-us-east-1/s3fs-public/2024-03/Proceeding-Against-Tenant-Holding-Over-Eviction-Form.pdf.

Initial thoughts was this is expensive but I have multiple GCs in the 400k range. 

Here are my initial thoughts:-Making the offer contingent on seller showing me background check documents from their due diligence-Requesting for a walkthrough of the property after the offer is made, and reserving the right to pull the offer if the house is not maintained wellAre these ideas practical?

First after their initial introduction they split everyone into groups and you don't get access to talk to anyone who is already in the group.

You also benefit from warranties that can reduce initial maintenance costs.

Looking at 4-5 months from initial offer to listing and I have a GC handling all the work, so my time has been just driving to check status/give input/drop off payment.

We will see these more frequently on variable rate debt with near term maturity datesOf course this will put the initial investors behind the new debt on the capital stack but it’s really just adding more buckets to shovel water out of a sinking boat.

A little over 400% ROI in 3 years (looking at initial investment only).

I would contact your original lender initially, as well as to contact a local mortgage broker.

The police department just posted on Nextdoor app that crime is down 29% in that area because of initiatives that they have implemented so now they will be implementing the same things in Capitol Heights.