This has been the old scam of investors, part of the reason I'm sure new laws have been adopted and such plays on the formation of a new regulatory agency, the CFPB, so far, they don't appear to be very investor friendly,doubt they will be in the future either.As Marc pointed out and as I mentioned, any note buyer will be considering the collateral, the market value.

However after doing some research I am wondering if the Buyer paying for a home inspection per the agreement (which provides benefits to both parties) MAY QUALIFY as consideration since there is a (non monetary) value exchange to the Seller by way of providing a third party inspection to be used in the disclosure and sale of the property.I'm curious if anyone has encountered this type of issue before?

I know I need to look at my loan documents to see whether such a transfer is ok, but I can't be the first person encountering this issue.

View that here:http://ridethatcashcownow.com/Hope this helps people from getting scammed out of their hard earned money.

It seemed as though he thought I was trying to scam him.Any suggestions are helpful.

It's a label that tends to be used interchangeably with words like "scam", "ripoff", "liar", "no credibility", and a lot of other negative connotations.

I'm curious if any other landlords have encountered anything like this.Basically, in the new ordinance, if my tenant gets arrested for pot smoking or one of their kids gets cited for underage drinking, I can't be a landlord in town for 3 years?

And then, of course, some people do scam the system.

U know like the Top 4 or 5 scenarios that you will encounter.

Covers almost every situation you as a Landlord will ever encounter.2.