And if the syndication is big enough, someone who loses their capital will decide to sue, some attorney will take the case, and if others who initially appear ready to face up to their own responsibility for their investment decisions are offered the opportunity to potentially recover some of the losses for a "free ride", they will join the bandwagon, and remember anything and everything you did incorrectly.Also, should the syndications investments go badly and investors sue, unless the syndicator is a strong national company, expect to be named in the resulting lawsuits as an individual defendant.

If you have driveby shootings, I wouldn't want to have to defend on two fronts.As Mike mentioned, access is a big plus for those with RVs and boats.

If you're feeling really snitty, suggest your eviction will include the Sheriff's office as a defendant, since he can't legally leave without their cooperation, and ask how the Sheriff could move him in without confirming your acceptance of him as a tenant in the first place.

The second would also need to be paid off because if there is equity, as they too will defend themselves if it makes financial sense.

We've only be able to connect with the plumber's wife who defended the price and we have yet to hear back from the plumber.

It would be tough to defend fees higher than $50 IMO but again, I am not sure if regs dealt with that.

It's always amazing to me how ardent the inexperienced are in defending their choosen "great one" guru.

I've never been a defendant, only the LL in evictions, but still ran into rulings that I didn't expect (tenant allowed to remain for a set time, my damage claims reduced or not allowed).

However, when others (friends, co-workers, etc.) criticize her for investing in real estate, she turns into a tiger and defends our actions.

That is as absurd as Rent Control.So tell me, all you folks who are defending Obama, "Do you feel all warm and fuzzy about the current economic climate in the United States?"