It might be worth a follow-up closer to the move-out date to confirm their plans, but avoid excessive contact to prevent escalation.

To scale successfully you have to get past the point where your newly increased expenditures exceed your increased revenue; past the point where your ROI allows you to “break even” on your investment, and past the point where the ROI is worth the increased risk, the increased aggravation, time, and “lifestyle” change, and past the point where you can step back from “operations” and concentrate on management.  

Quote from @Noah Wright: No, but here are some ways to increase ARV most dramatically:1.

The rent control in some cases is really unfair to the landlord as the percentage increases are virtually irrelevant when the rent is a small amount.

Though I expect that to increase in the future when more ADUs are constructed.

In Metro Detroit, and I'd think in most Midwest cities, investors really have two options:1) Buy Class B and either put more down to cashflow at closing or deal with 1-3 years of negative cashflow until rents increase.

The first couple is a no-brainer.The second group has too many people, increasing wear-and-tear on the home.

It’s just not worth it in Detroit especially with the low price points. 

It is worth noting that this is a completely different product from Sean's.

But I believe for the majority of mom and pop landlords, it's not worth offering a concession.