I feel like questions 2-6 are fair and legitimate questions that any wholesaler should be able to answer before they even attempt a contract.However, I feel like questions 1 and 7 are designed specifically to shut out a majority of the competition because most did not impose those barriers on you when you first started out. 

A project manager would be involved in rehabbing, but unnecessary if you're doing just a few a month.

So, based on your response, the former note holder is in violation of DF since they imposed a balloon?

Any good litigation attorney will be able to uncover who you are if they want to sue for big $, so the only 'benefit' to shielding your identity is having less confrontations, which in my opinion is unnecessary if you run your business properly.

@Matt BacenetI honestly don't see how this would work in the long term it would be way to much unnecessary work to play ninja landlord and wouldn't be worth it.

It can't help, but there's no need to send over a ton of unnecessary info.

If it's just rentals, check this out (comments too)-https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2013/08/1...Could be unnecessary overkill.

I guess I'm just wary of being taken advantage of, and I don't want to pay for unnecessary plans.

Its a nice feature but unnecessary.  

Originally posted by @Mark Derby: I understand the need for anonymity for all tenants but I think mothers with young children should be aware and decide for themselves if they are ok with having their children there before being stuck in a lease.So you're going to offer up the information of a woman who needs her information kept private to satisfy the unnecessary/non-request of a potential tenant?