Thats insane the government is proposing these rules. 

You have to understand that these people don't care about anything, and the government people are overworked and will not follow up with all the small cases. 

(Ironically, I'm sure a good portion of the people arguing against development are also upset with the government for not tackling the affordable housing issue.)If I were WIP and felt I just got cheated out of my right to develop that land, I would have put a fence around it. 

Yes, the government pays the Section 8 rent timely, but more and more tenants are having to pay a portion of their rent.

The provision that my city government was using to stop whole neighborhoods from adding adu’s was addressed.

(Government will set cybersecurity standards, but then are rarely enforced). 

I have liquid assets and want to make smart, scalable investments that balance cash flow, appreciation, and low risk.GoalsGenerate consistent cash flow to diversify my income.Maximize appreciation potential for long-term wealth growth.Invest in areas with low crime rates to minimize risk.Reduce my tax burden for 2024 with real estate purchases.My Current ThoughtsI’m torn between two main strategies:Multifamily Properties:Looking at markets like Austin, Raleigh, and Tampa for 10-50 unit multifamily properties.Love the scalability and centralized management, but I'm concerned about high upfront costs and competition.Section 8 Housing:Considering affordable markets like Memphis, Cleveland, or Indianapolis to purchase 5-10 single-family homes.I like the government-backed rent stability, but managing multiple properties across different locations seems intensive.Key QuestionsWhich strategy would you recommend for my goals and liquidity?

Personally, I would be shocked if a government agency looked into this.

Then in 2020 it turned out cashflow wasn’t guaranteed, the government could burn your cashflow to the ground and you could lose everything.

Also massive cuts to government spending that support recovering economies would not be good for that city.