These comments are from about two years ago… Although I disagree with a transaction fee as a real estate agent, if the buyer or seller does not pay this fee, it will come out of my commission… So it’s not negotiable for myself… the current fee in the area is now $595 and all the brokers have them … 

Second, as you can see on this thread, some of our colleagues take a rather cowboy approach, and I disagree with their position.

Plus none of us want this part of the tax law eliminated because some eager beaver IRS person keeps hearing of this "STR loophole" and decides to take steps to either change or get rid of it. agree to disagree-a loophole in tax is both, its not just a gap in the law.

Quote from @Ray Hage: I wouldn't worry too much yet but if after a couple more days of no activity, I would bring the price down a bit to be closer to the top end of the market and see if there are recent comparables that have been rented (especially if you have access to the MLS) I disagree about not worrying about getting no interest in 2 days.

Quality > quantity in my eyes, some may disagree with that and that is ok.

But I am sure plenty of other people will disagree with me

Did not know about this disagreeable feature of LVP.

Case in point: LA city... and most recently, in the dark of night without warning, Pomona.I know there will be some on this forum who may disagree and will have their personal stories of how to overcome it and work around it.

I disagree it’s strictly b2b.

There is no need to personally attach the intelligence or integrity of anyone who posts something you disagree with or who disagrees with something you post.