Second, single family homes as rental investments are not generally sustainable in Sacramento, as you've quickly learned.

.- You close on December 10th- The property is in great shape and does not need any significant repairs- It only needs some paint touch-up and changing a couple of broken fixtures, which you do yourself- You spend the next week buying furniture, electronics and supplies and installing/arranging everything yourself- You also roll up your sleeves and scrub the toilets and sinks and appliances- You put it on AirBnB/VRBO and have your first guest renting it for the 3 days of Christmas- You second guest rents it for the following weekend and leaves before NYE- You personally clean and restock the place between these two guestsCongrats!

Furniture. 

I'm an LP in 24 retail big box centers, we just lost 3 Conns Home stores out of 174 closing in 15 states plus closing their 280 Badcocks furniture and more stores too.

These subject to strategies all seem to risk doing something illegal, not my style or a strategy I would call sustainable.

Finally, the compact size of tiny homes often results in lower utility costs, further enhancing their affordability and sustainability.

I feel the padsplit model might not be that sustainable if it is that easy for the hosts to have legal troubles.

The 13% is not sustainable.

Although the Burnt Store areas are seeing somewhat sustainable demand for owner-occupied properties, we're currently still not seeing enough support for activities that would draw tourism into that area.

One concern that I have is that I need to be able to sustain this during a downturn.