Lol, no and I wouldn't, because I think of future consequences.You get what you vote for.

I think that there's a component of vote/post ratio (especially for folks working on their first 100 posts here as well) that has to do with adding value.

Would I vote for policies that I think hurt tenants and limit housing supply? 

similar to yours but for LTRs.https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/88/topics/1171104-the-m...he got 231 votes =)

Therefore my vote on this is no.

Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 44 record of how Senators voted here -> This tax bill required For Majority: 3/5 and didn't get it. ...

And, as a Condo project everyone is sharing in the water bill by allocation of the HOA fee which should be increased is common area expenses have risen.The water may be cheap and voted the best taste in the USA, but the sewage portion of the bill is not and a large amount is based off the water volume.

You can click on the ‘vote’ button if you like someone's post or is helpful, and there are ‘awards’ to earn on your profile.

Seasoned investors with over four or five digit posts and votes mentioning those lenders will have validity over some with two digit votes.  

t show.I read your story and it leads me to believe you were dealing with a HM broker and not the lender directly cause they won't even schedule a closing unless the loan passes UW, gets voted on by committee, and then stamped with final approval.