But the thing is, you can't pick up and move the house and the house will always have 3 feet on the right side, has nothing to do with my trying to purchase the land as the 3 feet is on the other side abutting another property.Do you have an idea of how that's interpreted?

The way I interpret this, you could ask the court to award you $48 for legal expenses incurred while filing the eviction, but this clause essentially says that if the tenant pays 3 things prior to eviction notice (past due rent, late fees, and any other costs the court mandates) they have the right to remain in the premises.

@Bill FennellyThe comps you look for should to be relative to what market you are in, and whether you are looking at wholesale or retail, pre-rehab, or move-in ready, etc...Comps are always a moving target - lots and lots of variables and each of those variables can be interpreted 100 ways depending on what your objective is - and after they've been interpreted, they can skew your valuation one way or another, sometimes VERY drastically.

The ability to "talk the language" without needing an "interpreter" seems to give me the arsenal for success while minimizing the dependencies.I am looking at Temple University Real Estate Institute's online coursework.

(remember I said most abide by)While each city and town can interpret and enforce easements differently, as a land owner you have the right to access your land - but you may not have the right to pour a concrete driveway as local building and development codes would apply.Hopefully you don't have to go battle the planning or zoning commissions over it.

If others have knowledge of this situation please chime in.Your interpretation is correct.  

Builders simply fear lawsuits so much that they won't build them... and I believe that's just wrong.Here is my view as I interpret the situation, in response to your questions:1) It will be hard for the local laws to skew further against condo development, in my view.  

I'm embarassed to say that I'm not even completely sure of which state office or agency here in SC would be responsible for enforcement.I am keenly aware of all the controversy, misinterpretation, and lack of consensus when it comes to correctly interpreting the Safe Act, Dodd Frank, and state licensing laws as they pertain to the sale of mobile homes (or any homes) when offering seller financing.Is there anyone here on the forums...maybe a fellow investor in South Carolina that could kindly advise me on where I can go to find out about any state specific exemptions to the SAFE ACT here in SC?

I am not sure how this is interpreted as a disadvantage factually but everyone is entitled to their own opinions on BP.  

Hiring", as most readers here will interpret it, may mean putting someone on your payroll as compared to a professional on your team whom you pay when you need them to do something for you.