(not that I even know either of these two men, it's just a made up conversation for illustrative purpose).That have to stand before the court for doing advertising outside their "Relm of Expertise" on a (I think) what is a non-financial instrument in the USA might not amount to anything other than attorney fees.I pulled from the internet: Cryptocurrencies are not financial instruments under U.S.

Good Lord, what an illustration of the concept: "Mo' money, mo' problems."

To illustrate just how the Federal Reserve's 14 months of aggressive interest hikes have chilled a major buyer of the residential real estate market, Redfin shows the record-breaking pullback in the chart below: The brokerage said the investors still in the market have shifted to buying or flipping more affordable properties due to tightening credit conditions.

Because the maximum amount the VA will guarantee is $600k (you can go higher than this, still at 0% down, but this illustration is in the realm of split entitlement - which is your situation, which also applies to you regarding remaining entitlement).Your buddy's home that you want to assume is $250k. $300k + $250k = $550k.$550k is less than the county loan limit of $600k, so it means you can assume the loan as long as you meet the DTI and credit limits.If your buddy's home is >$300k, say $350k, then $300k + $350k = $650k, which is > $600k.

As an illustration: I built condos last year but missed the market due to contractor delays and rate increases and decided to rent the units.

Youve already illustrated one major pitfall in selling it yourself.

I hope the above helps illustrate that statement. 

Account Closed   If you want to run the numbers from the census data where all these sites are getting the it: Housing Vacancies and Homeownership (census.gov)Also it depends on whether you do the stats as the number, type,  or % of vacant homes as Account Closed illustrated.

However posts like this illustrate the dark side of the endless positive propaganda on this site.

NYC is a great example of this, but is not unique in this regard.But to illustrate the larger point that the home itself is a depreciating asset—even if its price were to appreciate in real terms—we have to examine the possible "counterfactual" scenario.Imagine a scenario where you had the same exact piece of property with the same type, size and layout of home, but in one example, the home was built in 1970, and in one example it was built in 2020.