However, I do not wish to keep all my capital in these properties indefinitely.

The signed commitments, capital call period, and preferred return, combined together could be a solution for you to provide POF (without having to ask investors for money before a deal is identified), while also assuring your investors their money will not be sitting un-invested for an indefinite period of time.

As I said, there's no limit to how many 1031s you can execute, so you can potentially (and many people actually do this) continue to leapfrog from one property to the next (after holding for a sufficient period, usually 12-18 months) without paying taxes, indefinitely.

It was a great opportunity to capture equity and at the time we wanted to keep it indefinitely in our family as a vacation home.

I asked Fannie Mae to reduce the sales price by $4,600 so I could pay off the lien, and they refused that too, saying they were going to pursue the HOA legally in court.I didn't want to tie up $80K cash indefinitely, so I walked away.  

To those people, I say Karma will get you back.For the other replies:This is something that is sweeping the nation and is backing off lenders indefinitely.

If push comes to shove, he can sell the house and still walk away with cash in hand (technically, he'd be taking a loss, but in some cases, that's better than the alternative).Of course, if these are rental properties and the cash flow covers operating expenses and debt service (the aforementioned fundamentals), then technically neither person has a problem - they can just hold the properties indefinitely, or at least until the market rebounds. 

These leases have been built around the theory that inflation was going to hover at a 2% indefinitely. 

With the swift trend of companies letting individuals work from home indefinitely, it is going to change the bay area landscape.

If you're looking to hold the property indefinitely, then the deal is fine.