This type of testing will likely only reveal if there is a major leak.

I will not walk away from any flaw in the property itself where costs are definable.1) Is it possible to get solid bids that stay in line with the budget (and appropriate margin for error/unknowns vs ARV2) Physical inspection must reveal the full scope of the issues not don't enter the dreaded "we won't know till we tear into it."

The landlords daughter is selling the house, and I had her and the tenants fill out an estoppel agreement.The estoppel revealed that both tenants are on HUD Section 8 Voucher program and are paying $200 under market rents. 

Sometimes the bank will reveal their “max bid”....if $250k is owed on a $200k property, and they reveal $250k as their max bid, then there is no sense in bidding, which is why you see properties “sell” back to the bank for $100. 

The risk is that you've revealed your maximum offer, but in a hot seller's market, your options are somewhat limited.They also need to be prepared to act FAST. 

I got this email recently. Where is the legal directive for collecting this info? What happens if I don’t supply it?As our office is moving forward to ensure both current laws and new regulations are met we need to up...

Inspection report revealed the owner had updated ONLY the interior areas visible in photos, like the floors, kitchen, bath.

Tenant provided me 1 month's renters insurance before they moved in and after that I didn't ask for it, but during inspection, I do reveal that the tenant didn't carry renters insurance throughout the last 18 months.

With plans of occupying one unit and renting out the ones, we made an offer and the sale is currently contingent.Unfortunately, the inspection revealed some structural issues that might be a liability.

There could be a couple of common reasons....1) you didn’t reveal all of your debts, payments, etc 2) your loan officer/salesman didn’t properly look at your total financial picture.