Eddie Speed who runs noteschool.com is one.

Find a good one and keep them on speed dial.

What is better, 15% for 1 year and then 29 years at 3%, and a kick-*** deal you picked up as "cash"..... or conventional lending from the beginning and no bargaining power for speed?

It will also put pressure on the holdout states to speed up the end of their own moratoriums as the economic rationale for keeping them continues to erode. 

I have properties down-valley but not 100% up to speed with San Bernardino happenings.

In my area I go to the 13th circuit Court website and I can look up law suits and even speeding tickets.You should have something similar and I bet with a few tries on google you can find it.

However, you can actually save millions of dollars in taxes by starting during the blueprint phase.Here are some examples of ways to save on taxes:For conference rooms in a hotel, Instead of installing regular walls, if you install moveable walls, the walls could be depreciated using the rules of bonus depreciation.For a multi-family apartment complex, changing the model of the bathroom exhaust fan to a variable speed could help qualify for the energy credit which is $2,000/unit.For a large apartment complex, installing a ceiling fan could allow you to qualify for 45L tax credits.For a hotel, if the porte-cochere is detached from the hotel building, it could be fully deductible in year one as it could be considered a land improvement.

This isn't directly related to 121, but bears on it.From the Gates conclusion: "If a taxpayer sold some part of the underlying land but not the dwelling that the taxpayer used as a principal residence, the taxpayer could not defer the recognition of gain on the sale because the taxpayer did not sell his or her principal residence. . .If petitioners had sold their old home instead of demolishing it, they would have qualified for the section 121 exclusion.

This isn't directly related to 121, but bears on it.From the Gates conclusion: "If a taxpayer sold some part of the underlying land but not the dwelling that the taxpayer used as a principal residence, the taxpayer could not defer the recognition of gain on the sale because the taxpayer did not sell his or her principal residence. . .If petitioners had sold their old home instead of demolishing it, they would have qualified for the section 121 exclusion.

Either way it may take a few years unless we make some adjustments.I am looking for advice on how we can speed up the process of adding another multifamily to our portfolio?