(such as getting a title search)I would hate to have a property quit claimed over to me only to find out later that there is an extra 30k lien from a contractor for unpaid work.. or even a 2nd mortgage that wasn't disclosed.. so now you're on the hook for that as well and it destroys the cash flow you thought you were going to get.

I'm wondering if it would be more sensible to buy a quadplex close to UCF and be able to get $1,000 per unit in rent a month but risk the place being destroyed every year and high tenant turn over. 

Those that don't move on their own, don't destroy the unit on their way out, and are not followed by an eviction on their record.

It never fails, especially on our C level apartments the tenants just destroy hollow cores.  

That class of tenant will be destroying anything you put in, therefore spend the least amount you must :)Hope this helps.

If I have to remove on then it will have to be destroyed on site.

To be honest with everybody it really doesn't matter to me if the house burns down or falls down in a tornado or is destroyed by an earth quake etc etc.

Just destroys them.

In the case of an eviction, don't think a landlord can do anything to encourage a tenant not to destroy the place.

Is he/she in a large crate so they don't destroy the dwelling?