They sue people, settle and he gets money, his brother-in-law gets attorney fees from defendants. there are 3 additional lawsuits from collection agencies against the tenant and his wife as well.I contacted lawyers, they keep continuous $700 retainer fees, $275 for each letter, his brother-in-law will keep sending.

I signed because of the atmosphere, the support, and the proof that if you stay with this brokerage you will become a champion.

Long enough to be able to claim with a straight face (and defend this claim if challenged) that you had an expectation of investment profits from renting your former house. 

One of my best friends is a state champion kickboxer. 

But one good reason I can think of not to have a trust own it is because the trust then becomes the defendant in any lawsuit.

That said I would also recommend highly retaining a BK attorney yourself to defend you in court rather than appear alone.

it should have been fixed.Other than that, if there was a slip/trip/fall on your property, contact your insurance company to make them aware, and if you have the proper coverage their legal team will defend.  99 out of 100 times, there will be 'legal blackmail' and a settlement will be reached. 

Its as WAG  he has another post with a meet up to show people how not to be a 95% er   That was my guess, just wanted to give the OP a chance to defend the assertion.

If no one appears in court to defend the foreclosure then the statute of limitations won't be applied and the foreclosure would proceed as normal.   

But, you have to have a business and eventually have to defend it if audited.