What made it complicated is sibling are in a squabble over it and accused other siblings of taking advantage of someone whose competence is questioned.

Somebody wanting to sue for you backing out of a bad deal or accusing you of selling them a property with defects like unknown termite damage).

You accuse me of being Closed Minded and Defensive?

I'm not accusing either side of doing wrong, but why not make more sure?

They accused me of all names, I offer they can leave as they are not happy with me as landlord.

This way each tenant falls under the same criteria; this avoids discriminatory accusations.  

That way if they try accusing you of anything later, you have a copy of their unqualified application.I ask people have if they have an income of three times the rent AND I ask them if a landlord has ever filed court papers against them before showing the house.

You certainly won't be accused of tax evasion for misallocation of expenses actually incurred.Now folks, Steve is correct in his opinion and this is not an argument as to what is correct, but simply showing that some accountants will be more conservative than others.

But as far as squatting by accusations of seeing a rat, that is not the case here, now.

Why don't you all just forget about QCDs in selling transaction, get a title search, pay the two hundred bucks on these 20K properties for title insurance and avoid getting messed over, losing your investment, time, effort, and possibly being tagged with larger bills or being accused of fraud?