I dont think it would be the route to stick with but starting out to gain some marketing money and exposure to the transactions could be a huge benefit.

This will give some exposure to the vast world of real estate investing and all the unique ways to get into investing.

If they have a current mortgage on the property, subject-to is not the strategy I would personally go for given the exposure and risk-to-return factor. 

Bogle:  I don't support his HFT endorsement and don't like he avoids international exposure.

I would start one from scratch and then convey the properties one at a time into the new series LLC.In terms of the potential pitfalls...Some lawyers are concerned that courts will simply disregard the series structure and open the entire entity to exposure -- even though the statute specifically says that the assets and liabilities are segregated. 

I'm in a similar situation coming from a wall st background and have exposure to mbs analytics amongst many other things.

At the very least, as a way to gain more exposure into various parts of the business, or to lower my costs in the beginning (via self representation as an agent).

Hence we're dealing with that here, hence another cause for unnecessary delays.Also, I wanted to get him in earlier like I do all of my projects but didn't get a chance to on this one - I brought the 'Sonphew' (my nephew who I'm raising as my Son) through the house to give him (continued) exposure to investing, construction and business.

So the challenge is to create a situation whereby I either own or control the units and the seller receive monthly payments avoiding or greatly minimizing tax exposure.

This might be a no brainer, but here goes anyway.As a beginner is it ever too early to begin visiting properties to gain some exposure and experience?