The members did not observe corporate formality; The Defendant did not pay dividends; The Defendant was insolvent at the time of its actions; The Defendant’s members siphoned funds from the Defendant for their own personal use; The Defendant’s members comingled funds; There are no corporate records; The corporation(s) were a facade and alter ego of the member(s) of the Defendant.

The condition is so bad the home is not worth the purchase price for collateral. 

Instead it looks like a sales pitch that is targeted to unsophisticated investors who are new to the space.If that's actually the situation here than these deals generally have multiple things I can't stomach and is an immediate red flag for me.2) AAA Storage growth: At one point I was interested in this sponsor because of the claimed full real estate cycle track record with little to no money lost.

The only reason I buy them is because I think that if I get one extra detail that was missed in another, it is worth the course price.The land riches blueprint covers building up capital, passive income, subdividing, entitlement & more which is why I value it more than others. 

The records of the closed title company MIGHT show how they handled the issue, but more likely they missed this issue otherwise as part of their solution a mortgage satisfaction document would have been recorded at that time. 4.

Very refreshing to see such a great and clear plan and attitude.. net work=>net worth  usually:)

If you get a bad tenant in there that causes thousands worth of damage, then the tenant should be on the hook, right!?.

However, definitely worth a look.Zillow might work aswell, but definitely has it's limitation.

Based on my experience, it’s often not worth the time and expense because appeals frequently lead to no change in the tax assessment.

Especially if seller just received a windfall from the sale it is definitely worth suing for damages.