(i.e. walking in a saying you have a bad check is not the same as having a bad check, you are making an allegation.) 

The landlord has a reasonable time after notification to repair the defect or damage alleged by the tenant (repairs must be made with “diligence and without culpable delay” (Section 9-14.2(a)(5)); more than 30 days is presumed unreasonable) and upon completion of the repairs, must notify the tenant or the Department of Housing and Community Development in writing (Section 9-14.2(c)). - See more at: http://www.peoples-law.org/special-laws-rules-balt...Also...... " Landlord may not evict tenant, increase the rent, or decrease any services to which tenant is entitled for any of the following reasons (Section 9-10(a)):Solely because tenant complained in good faith to the landlord or to a public agency concerning the tenant's rights or concerning a housing deficiency;Solely because tenant is a member of a tenants' organization;Solely because tenant filed suit against the landlord; orSolely because tenant consulted a lawyer on a matter involving the tenant's rights.

February we started with the eviction process since she didn't move nor pay febs rent. fast forward to end of march.my in-laws came back from Florida and they were staying with us. there was an issue with the some rotten food of hers in the fridge that was thrown out and she decided it would be OK to start thrashing the place throwing things and finally assaulting my mother in law. the cops was called and she got charged with elderly abuse and spent 2 nights in jail.my mother in law was able to get a restraining order against her for a year and she is not allowed into the house because that is where my mother inlaw is staying. her belongings are still there.we went to court this past Tuesday for the eviction and the judge was not there. while speaking with the mediator, she is alleging that she cant find a place and wants 60 days in order to find something. my lawyer said "what makes you think you can live there when, you never paid, you assaulted someone living there and you still have not found a place to live?'

He lived there for a year and never notified you of this alleged issue until he was facing eviction, and now he's trying to throw some crap against the wall and hope something sticks.

HUD investigates discrimination complaints and those complaints can arise years after the alleged discrimination occurs.All that person has to do is visit http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?

hence why its vital to have a record/receipt of any rental property having been treated (ie, sprayed or 'heat' treated) in between each tenant.absent proof of  a preventative treatment before tenant moved in, its up in the air if they are blaming landlord for an allegedly pre-existing condition.i'd give them the option to vacate if they can't take care of the pest problem as its a single family detached.

It is a little farther from the new office/retail development than property one, but in a slightly quieter neighborhood.The sale price is $230,000 ($115k per side -- apparently duplexes are separately deeded here in Texas so I'll have two mortgages)Anticipated rent $2200 (one side allegedly already rented at $1200/mo, I'm being conservative by assuming $1000/mo for the other side)Taxes $260/moInsurance $167/moRepair reserve $125/moProperty mgmt $240/mo (same as above, I will handle myself)Debt service (P&I) $946/moCash flow: $460/mo (same caveat for vacancy allowance)My initial thought is to go for the duplex because its more cash flow and slightly less risk that you would be without both tenants at once.

In addition, six cities in the United States have enacted similar laws – Urbana, IL; Madison, WI; Santa Cruz and San Francisco, CA; Washington, D.C; and Binghamton, NY.While there is no federal statute that specifically identifies obese individuals as a protected class, employees and job applicants across the country have initiated lawsuits alleging disability discrimination on the basis of their weight.

He has allegedly been harassing her and threatening to move back in because he is on the lease.

I would think if employers are allowed to screen based on allegations (regardless of conviction or plea), that a landlord could also use this public record information as a screening tool.