Replacement homes will be climate hardened, smaller, functional and include consideration for the type of infrastructure, architecture and sustainable/durable materials utilized. 

You'll end up in court with a lease agreement that says rent is $1, and the recommended tip is $1,999.

They still owe the back rent as evidenced by the fact that your resident gave you a credit card authorization.If CFPB doesn't have a solution, then you have to decide if going to small claims court is worth it.

RM (and most other good management software) does double entry accounting, imports bank info, has reconciling functions etc.

The real issue is that they didn’t have a plan to monitor usage or set up protections to minimize costs during the eviction process.Ideally, the PM could’ve done things like:Limit access to unnecessary areas to reduce power use.Install smart thermostats to keep heat at a safe minimum.Request a utility cap in court during eviction proceedings (if allowed in your area).Bottom line: It’s less about the utility switch itself and more about proactively managing costs once the tenant overstayed.bro what? 

If the accredited investor took your money and ran, you probably wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court because you weren't supposed to be In the deal in the first place.  

I'd rather pay for a platform whose revenue comes from subscription fees because at least they are developing features and functionality for the "right reasons.I've never heard of Digb (what kind of name is that?). 

Instead, shut off the water to the toilet and place a sign on the door "Art exhibit: Non-functioning bathroom."

II wonder if it would stand up in court that they could force you to use their contractual payment requirements on your own Private property.

The strip of land is utterly worthless to anyone but him but he's happy to pay $450k to resolve everything without the courts input.I retain 100% of my building, 99.999% of my land, and 100% of my existing mortgage.