
22 March 2016 | 2 replies
To do otherwise can be a major mistake and considered fraudulent.

2 February 2016 | 73 replies
To not have a strong OA or none at all is like bringing a fly swatter into combat!

2 February 2016 | 17 replies
So if if they are taking deductions based on a marijuana business they are filing fraudulent federal returns.
29 January 2016 | 40 replies
I would recommend that the OP speak to a licensed attorney in their state of operation, as I am seeing legal issues beyond the mere act of conveyance here; Primarily I see issues of fraudulent conveyance, and the possibility for a judgment creditor to potentially file a suit to void the transfer.

13 April 2016 | 6 replies
So no funny business or fraudulent documentation with falsified quotes.

11 February 2016 | 21 replies
If he is living there, they are fraudulently accepting taxpayer money.

18 April 2016 | 8 replies
The banks do this to reduce fraudulent and/or deceptive activities.

13 April 2016 | 10 replies
Just because you lived there, and made monthly payments, you Never owned it, no title transfer, no recorded land contract, no nothing (unless you tried to go back and fraudulently create some sort of back dated land contract documents, that were still never recorded).

21 April 2016 | 3 replies
Now I suppose someone can do this improperly, which I suppose would amount to fraudulent activity.

25 September 2019 | 5 replies
I am not an attorney but I would think this may be construed as a fraudulent conveyance and any moderately competent attorney would pierce this type of transfer.