I have some referrals in Austin and in Utah that are absolutely fantastic and specialize in just real estate taxation for large clients.

Kali's mass exodus due to rampant taxation and poor government is benefiting Texas in a big way and will likely continue to do so as their homeowners free the albatross house around their neck and move to greener economic pastures.

Here is an article that discusses whether or not it is advantageous to finance your home from a taxation perspective:Tax DeductionOf course it helps, but I think the point of the comments above is that you shouldn't count on the deduction because Congress can change that fairly easily as is evidenced in the articles floating the test balloons again.

New investors usually don't go with a corporate structure because of double taxation and employment requirements, but if you don't have health inusrance, or other retirement benefits, that might be an option for you.Bottom line, I suggest you see both, an attorney and an accountant.

My understanding is that this is not subject to UBIT taxation if things are structured the "right way."

If we simply lowered our taxation on corporations and encouraged them to send capital back to shareholders to deploy it efficiently wouldn't it help the overall economy and thus the tax coffers?

Contact a CPA familiar with non-profit accounting and taxation.

Nowhere else are consumers more exposed to double-taxation, usurous fees and the like to access their own funds.As it applies to our society, and RE as well, shifting from debt to production as a greater share of GDP is going to be key.

For example, if you have $300k in leftover revenue, do you pre-emptively spend on the property to avoid the taxation, or take the profit AFTER taxes and put it towards an emergency fund for more difficult years?

For the seller, I doubt that there will be any consideration as to financial needs, estate planning, taxation, not to mention any portfolio distributions which would be beyond the capability of most originators.