
30 January 2013 | 24 replies
I respectfully disagree about being able to get 1,000 homes up as fast you suggest.

2 February 2012 | 18 replies
It goes on from there to exclude if you are renting your home.Also, the deadline is tomorrow for the recipient of the form to receive it.I'd look into this.Jeff, I disagree with your accountant.

3 February 2012 | 21 replies
Maybe you meant to ask a slightly differnet question, where "LTV" is replaced by "ARV" or "appraised value" ...I disagree.

20 October 2014 | 22 replies
But I disagree with Terri's premise that "All of this credit card thing should not be necessary if you are truly, thoroughly screening your tenants."

10 February 2012 | 1 reply
Have you examined the lease agreements?

17 February 2012 | 7 replies
Sanjiv-I have to disagree slightly with you so please don't take any offense.

23 February 2012 | 18 replies
Here is why: The property's market value at acquisition and the property's market value upon exit are two different numbers and they are only different because of the dollars you put in to make improvements.As in Eric's example, if such a thing were true, nobody would put any money into the deal and sell for profits on a rehab.Don Hines I would have to disagree with your assessment as well.

21 February 2012 | 18 replies
I disagree about the charging the upfront fee makes a serious buyer.I can't tell you how many scammers I have seen in the commercial lending arena.I can say one problem lenders face is they get a package submitted to them and then give an LOI.Then in due diligence the buyer finds out the income levels and returns were not as stated.Now the lender wants a bigger payment down from the buyer or the buyer has to get the seller to reduce to the actual proven numbers.The deal falls out and the lender made nothing.The way to solve this is submit a detailed and verified package upfront.This way you know the numbers you are sending have been verified.Lenders site confidentiality etc. when doing loans so you can't verify other properties they have closed.If lenders state money has to be in escrow or a deposit have YOUR attorney hold in an account the lender does not have access to or authorization to.This way the money can be shown to be there and earmarked for the purposes of the loan.I am telling you these scammers will do anything to separate you from your money.I know some deals I wasn't involved in where the people chased the lender for 6 months to get back 500k.Do not let lenders PUFF fees.If they say they have to pay for appraisal then tell them you will pay the appraiser directly.If you are a legit lender and you make money when you close a loan you should have no problem with this.If however you are a fee generator mill and you hardly close anything or a point taker with upfront fees I can't tell clients to work with you.Some point takers take money to submit apps knowing the lender will not close or that it's a sham.They usually charge a small amount upfront to entice the victim.Usually 500 to a few thousand.

24 February 2012 | 13 replies
We are examining the multi-unit market in Austin, San Antonio, (I'll be there on the 4th), & D/FW .