The proof in the pudding is that the only offer is way off the alleged ARV.I'm over it.  

(CEO got fired or quit, CFO allegedly attempted to blackmail the company for alleged improprieties on certain deals, accredited investor volume fell off a cliff and disappeared, etc.).

Sometimes ARV will not increase AT ALL! eg

With just a small amount of effort ALL the alleged genius of his experience can be found for free, right here on this site.

The notice shall specify the time, not less than ten days, within which the tenant is required to remedy the breach and shall be in substantially the following form: "(Name and address of tenant) (date)You are hereby notified that you have failed to perform according to the following rule:(specify rule allegedly breached)Be informed that if you (continue violating) (again violate) this rule after (a date not less than ten days after this notice), the landlord may terminate the rental agreement and sue for possession of your dwelling unit."

Although I am interested in whether the fact that both of the indicted parties were allegedly realtors posed something of a conflict of interest.

From my view, the type of demand that is allegedly causing this valuation "bubble" is unconventional.

Whether the (alleged) additional legal protection, if any, justifies this monumental increase in cost and complexity is a big question mark.Also, never listen to legal or tax advice coming from real estate gurus, none of them.

"I would ask for a few (min 3) CURRENT Real References to interview, and be prepared with real questions about quality of Tenants and some of the allegations such as Keys-remotes stories.Trust-but-Verify,Verify,Verify

One time I was speaking to an alleged past landlord, and asked him why there was a different name on the property tax records (even looking back into the past ownership).