@Pat Marco I know you are an attorney and I am not but I'm originally from Puerto Rico and I've heard on PR news channels when interviewing the politicians that came up with this tax incentives (like Alberto Baco Bague, Secretary of Economic Development and Commerce), that you HAVE to move to Puerto Rico in order to apply.

There are signs all over used by politicians and other businesses.  

It's like the crazy left wing SF politicians: they do everything to limit market rate housing, as they inadvertently help increase values on existing properties.

And who knows if there was a little extra put in his pockets or the local politicians.

I'd say you're probably good to put up bandit signs on the same street corners on which the politicians put up their campaign advertising... 

My taxible income is 10k or $2,500 at 25% tax rate or an effective tax rate of 8%. 25% of those savings over 16 years in my case will require me to return $17,500 at the close of sale which I included in my figures above.According to case shiller, real estate has only increased an average of 4%/year (worse than bonds) over the long run and average cash yields in Cali is 3-4% making turnkey property investing today for the average 9-5 guy obsolete and unaffordable for the middle class thanks to our politicians and institutions, hundreds of get rich quick books, videos, seminars and sites like these for creating an environment that treats single family homes like a pump and dump stock.

Every politician creates loopholes and deductions for themselves and their friends to avoid tax.

This is going to be dragged out and covered up with printing press, paper and ink.Putting a floor under the residential housing market should be the very top priority of politicians, everything else hinges on equity in our homes, we can lose the commercial market to some extent, but firming up the residential market should be job one.will they extend, my guess is yes, but I would not bet on it.

Just think if our politicians could collaborate like this. 

Politicians who don't want low wage labor to VOTE, for the reason that, in general, lower wage workers vote D.4.