data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83831/83831fef095e264107b6695943f72367f1780fe8" alt=""
22 November 2019 | 1 reply
In most cases, the homeowners might not realize that you're the same person who mailed them last month so it's important to use some branding or identity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d436/7d4367bbe90bc65d704ade6441a46596a91675ca" alt=""
6 April 2012 | 7 replies
Nice, Carlos, except I never put up any security for a neighbor, they just apparently used my identity 26 years ago and since it was never reported on my credit report before now, I didn't know anything about it, and I now have to come up with documents from 26 years ago which I do not have as I thought 7 years was the limit to dispute a witness he used that was an old, ill tenant of his that did not want her rent raised and is dead now, not a bank employee or even a notarized statement that would verify it, to to prove it wasn't me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cfbf/0cfbf32b89f61e449608769184dc6bed4493e68b" alt=""
2 May 2013 | 2 replies
note: *He refuses to do any sort of online background check whether I submit the information or if he submits it- he had his identity stolen twice so now he’s super paranoid of it happening again.Question: Is there another way of doing this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6b3b/c6b3b31e329e526d505f309e9fdef659e27878ab" alt=""
18 April 2011 | 25 replies
I didn't get that at all from the posts.I'm sure you would have something to share here, if you are willing to do so and the returns, like any investment are down the road, not immediate.Keep in mind, there is no one on this site that knows it all and there are probably a few who know as much anyone but that's not to say that what one knows is identical, so we share it.You can start by telling me something I don't know, make it new, different and exciting....seriously, throw out something we can sink our teeth in!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bde/c2bde4eff79edbb5a20f16065f78f04225f9eb87" alt=""
26 July 2014 | 19 replies
I had a deck that looked almost identical to this, and I took all of the boards off (saved them for other projects), put new decking down and new rails on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89a41/89a41a6ed406c7a6c61d517fad88ffc2631b1c0b" alt=""
17 February 2019 | 32 replies
Also in for an update on the Germantown market like @Cliff Tsang, I purchased a couple of student rentals near Temple earlier in the year and I am considering Germantown next as I like the variety of homes (it does not seem to be block after block of identically laid out rowhomes).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b264/7b264b94f5f61bc92b7158d441207cde18444e01" alt=""
10 November 2021 | 15 replies
Their exam prep was great - it seemed like half of the exam questions were almost word-for-word identical.
26 June 2017 | 8 replies
ABANDONMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY72.101 and:(1) the last known address of the apparent owner, as shown on the records of the holder, is in this state;(2) the records of the holder do not disclose the identity of the person entitled to the property, and it is established that the last known address of the person entitled to the property is in this state;(3) the records of the holder do not disclose the last known address of the apparent owner, and it is established that:(A) the last known address of the person entitled to the property is in this state; or(B) the holder is a domiciliary or a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state and has not previously paid or delivered the property to the state of the last known address of the apparent owner or other person entitled to the property;(4) the last known address of the apparent owner, as shown on the records of the holder, is in a state that does not provide by law for the escheat or custodial taking of the property or is in a state in which the state's escheat or unclaimed property law is not applicable to the property, and the holder is a domiciliary or a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state;(5) the last known address of the apparent owner, as shown on the records of the holder, is in a foreign nation and the holder is a domiciliary or a government or governmental subdivision or agency of this state; or(6) the transaction out of which the property arose occurred in this state and:(A) the last known address of the apparent owner or other person entitled to the property is:(i) unknown; or(ii) in a state that does not provide by law for the escheat or custodial taking of the property or in a state in which the state's escheat or unclaimed property law is not applicable to the property; and(B) the holder is a domiciliary of a state that does not provide by law for the escheat or custodial taking of the property or a state in which the state's escheat or unclaimed property law is not applicable to the property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/899cc/899ccf3cd377c27bcf4c5d500e194dc9d3bfef04" alt=""
30 July 2017 | 5 replies
This is an open-ended post. I hope to hear from both sides, those on this site who are for and against the model of wholesaling that most promote. I hope to hear some thought-processes I haven't heard yet. I hope you ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a874a/a874a1346b77141ba7bf282e2375c9d8353d80e8" alt=""
24 September 2017 | 4 replies
As a practical matter, the identity of the tenants or the terms of the lease may not be readily apparent to the lender to determine whether any of the above exceptions apply.