Boston actually has enforcements with teeth.

I would suggest finding a partner that compliments you and find a deal that is simple and safe to cut your teeth.

It only takes one litigation attorney owner or a well-heeled owner to sue the cityThe only way that regulations with teeth could be put into effect would be the State deciding to allow cities to have home rule again. 

Also use a superior quality primer and an eggshell enamel paint.

If you have a question about your teeth, would you rather ask the dentist or the butcher?

It’s similar to us SF landlords that self-managed to cut our teeth and held on to the properties until the market allowed better deals to be found where we could cover property management costs.

It might reduce the impact when someone rear ends you, but it doesnt keep the bugs out of your teeth as you drive along.

This is what we call "teeth" and we've never had a problem since this clause has been in our lease. 2) You won't be able to control human behavior, in terms of the condition the departing tenants keep the home in. 

@Wayne Brooks  I think Assumable went the way of the dodo bird years ago.. at least I have not seen one in for ever.I acutally did one in Napa CA when I moved there from Palo Alto.. but it was like pulling teeth.. but were else was I going to get into a Napa valley home for 5k down  LOL.. best move I ever made

Had to pull teeth with the PM at the end of November to find out what was going on, and he finally ended up posting a 72 hour notice on 12/2.