If I offer a pure investment than it does not have the same appeal.I came by an investment model used in another country where the investors were able to receive an interest during the construction time but could down the road could add the necessary capital and buy a condo in a presell price.

My ask is if this is a good financing model then what exit strategies will I have with interest rates being what they currently are and no realization of what they will be in 5-10 years went the loan is due?

The flip isn't always as fast but it's a very sustainable model with excellent margins.As for the "Where", just focus on a place with solid market dynamics where you have a tangible competitive advantage.

Thanks for your time :) -Ben, aspiring multifamily house hacker I input your assumptions into my model, but leaned less punitively.

My business model is similar to the sneaker heads who resell Jordan’s, so it can be volatile which concerns me.

I like several of the app's mentioned but my office is not a model of well-organized efficiency. 

My business model is similar to the sneaker heads who resell Jordan’s, so it can be volatile which concerns me.

I do think new models will emerge however the more I digest this settlement & believe me I more than anyone would love to see the industry transformed, I think the more likely outcome is just reduced net commissions and reduced volume for agents, while not being an extinction level event either.

You seller-finance the construction of the permanent houses (and keep one as a 'model home'), but retain the ownership of the land itself to avoid permitting headaches. 

The evolving landscape of work culture, with a marked shift towards remote and hybrid models, has drastically reduced the demand for traditional office spaces.