Agreed with all the above interpretations. 

Could it be interpreted that way, arguably yes.But if you're going to challenge a law's constitutionality, the reference I provided is perhaps the most common method.

Yes i have read it and anyone who has read it and understood it could not possibly interpret this as an NAR win, there are still outstanding lawsuits by the way, The NAR will lose a lot of members, a lot of income, and most importantly, a lot of political power as a result of all this, the financial payout is nothing compared to all this.

However, I suspect most people interpret worst to be a poor place for RE investment return. 

As you can see, even these two formulas leave room for interpretation.3.

I'm not able to interpret that text in the way you guys have. 

Interesting how different jurisdictions interpret individual rights. 

Note: this is not legal advice but an interpretation as an HOA manager for more than 20 years before becoming a Realtor. 

I'm on the NARPM site, but how can I interpret the search results?

I wanted to ideally use a minimum credit score cut off for tenants since that's something I'm familiar with and know how to interpret, so I'm wondering if you all do the same and if so, what screening service do you use that gives you tenants' actual credit score?