Relying on “charging order” protection is somewhat outdated.  

It was outdated but move in ready otherwise.  

All of that said, I would treat this tenant as month-to-month and enforce the 60 day notice requirement meaning that they are responsible for an additional 30 days of rent beyond their anticipated move-out date.

Ensure that all electrical fittings are up to code and replace any outdated wiring as necessary.Outdoor Space:Patio/Deck: The small deck area provides a nice outdoor space.

One additional item to consider is to buy an outdated property, rehab it and refinance it, this way you would have less cash into the deal and higher Cash on Cash Returns.

Units are in good shape otherwise, besides those cosmetic/outdated issues.Thanks for any input you all can provide!

VTSTRA has a (slightly outdated) list of town ordinances: https://vtstra.org/regs but that does not even get into some of the crazy proposals being tossed around at the state level, like an additional 10% STR tax (atop the 9% M&R + 1% local options tax already in place in many communities). https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2024/WorkGroups/House%20Ways%20and%20Means/Short-term%20Rentals/W~Kirby%20Keeton~Short-term%20rentals%20draft%20language~3-13-2024.pdf

So, I don't think procuring cause applies here at all UNLESS they were using the OLD outdated no longer used Nonexclusive agency agreement but that wouldn't make sense because they talked about "cancelling" it which with a Nonexclusive agreement makes no sense.

At that point, if your tenant is not willing to renew,  you simply advise the tenant that you will not be renewing their lease, and provide them a move-out date by which they must vacate the property.  

If you are just looking at Zillow it is often out dated.